It’s funny how whenever ableism is brought up in the context of this argument it always lines up perfectly, by sheer coincidence, with the personal preferences of the person making the argument and stops immediately at that point.
Like, it’s always “I don’t enjoy the combat in this game AND AS A SHEER COINCIDENCE, APROPOS OF NOTHING, IT’S ALSO ABLEIST, BUT I PROMISE MY PREFERENCE IS NOT INFLUENCING MY CONCERN AT ALL”
They never also bring up the issues color-blind people have with games, they never advocate making puzzles optional for people who have some sort of disability to prevent them from comprehending them. They never advocate skipping dialogue sections in games because some people are unable to understand social situations or read face and body language.
It’s just curious to me how their concern for the differently-abled hard stops the moment it no longer lines up with their personal preferences, almost like they’re motivated by self-interest rather than altruism, but hey ¯\_(ツ)_/¯